From 21b75a1ad5545e206ada8137fadf2e85df5c728a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerardo Marx Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:56:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update 'README.md' --- README.md | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 26a239e..6ff90a3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,2 +1,29 @@ -# grading-table +### Proposed Laboratory Rubric — 100 Points +| Criterion | Weight | What You Assess | +|---|---:|---| +| **1. Laboratory preparation** | 10% | Student arrives knowing the objective, circuit/system, required equations, components, and basic procedure. | +| **2. Experimental implementation** | 20% | Correct assembly, wiring/programming, instrument configuration, appropriate measurement procedure, and safe use of equipment. | +| **3. Results and measurements** | 15% | Obtains coherent experimental data, records units and conditions correctly, identifies anomalous measurements, and repeats measurements when necessary. | +| **4. Interpretation and technical reasoning** | 20% | Explains *why* the observed behavior occurs and connects experimental results with theory rather than merely reporting values. | +| **5. Live technical defense** | **20%** | Answers questions about the circuit, code, equations, measurements, or procedure **individually and without AI assistance**. | +| **6. Live modification / troubleshooting** | **10%** | Makes a small modification requested by the instructor and predicts/explains its effect. | +| **7. Laboratory record / brief report** | 5% | Provides concise evidence: measurements, calculations, plots, observations, and conclusions. | +| **Total** | **100%** | | + +### Performance Scale + +A simple four-level scale would make grading during the laboratory practical: + +| Level | Description | Score | +|---|---|---:| +| **4 — Excellent** | Performs independently, explains decisions correctly, detects problems, and relates results to theory. | 90–100% | +| **3 — Competent** | Performs correctly with minor errors or limited assistance; explanation demonstrates adequate understanding. | 75–89% | +| **2 — Developing** | Completes part of the task but requires substantial assistance or cannot fully explain the implementation/results. | 60–74% | +| **1 — Insufficient** | Cannot perform essential procedures or demonstrate understanding of the submitted work. | 0–59% | + +### Important Assessment Rule + +**The report should not compensate for an inability to demonstrate understanding in person.** + +**Authenticity requirement:** A student who cannot explain or modify the submitted circuit, program, analysis, or experimental procedure during the individual defense cannot receive more than **70/100** for the laboratory activity, regardless of the quality of the submitted documentation. \ No newline at end of file